Developer Onboarding
Reference

Bugbot Reference

Complete reference guide for using Bugbot effectively, including workflows and integration patterns

Team Practices

Bugbot-assisted PR Template

## Bug Fix: [Title]

**Original Issue:** #123

**Root Cause:**
[Bugbot's explanation of what was wrong]

**Fix Approach:**
[What was changed and why]

**Bugbot Assistance:**

- Bugbot identified root cause in @[file]
- Bugbot suggested fix approach
- Human refined to handle [edge case]
- Human added [additional test]

**Testing:**

- [x] Added test that reproduces bug
- [x] Verified fix resolves issue
- [x] Ran full test suite (all pass)
- [x] Tested edge cases manually
- [x] No regression in related features

**Review focus:**

- [ ] Does fix address root cause (not symptom)?
- [ ] Are edge cases covered?
- [ ] Business logic correct?

Code review focus:

  • Root cause correctly identified?
  • Fix is minimal and targeted?
  • Tests actually catch the bug?
  • No new bugs introduced?

When Bugbot Needs Human Pairing

These bugs require human + Bugbot collaboration:

  1. Race conditions - Bugbot can identify, human must verify timing
  2. Memory leaks - Bugbot can spot patterns, human must profile
  3. Integration issues - Bugbot suggests, human tests with real systems
  4. Performance bugs - Bugbot optimizes, human benchmarks
  5. Security issues - Bugbot flags, human does security review

Pattern:

Bugbot: Analyzes + Suggests
Human: Verifies + Tests + Approves

Integration with Bug Tracking

Linear/Jira → Bugbot workflow:

Step 1: Create ticket with Bugbot-friendly format

Title: [BUG] Checkout fails for international addresses

Environment: Production
Severity: High
Affected users: ~15% (international customers)

Reproduction:

1. Add item to cart
2. Enter UK address: "10 Downing St, London, SW1A 2AA"
3. Click checkout
4. Error: "Invalid postal code"

Expected: Should accept UK postal codes
Actual: Rejects with validation error

Stack trace:
[paste from logs]

Related files:

- src/checkout/CheckoutService.ts
- src/validation/AddressValidator.ts

Step 2: Use ticket content with Bugbot

Copy ticket → Paste to Bugbot → Add @file references

Step 3: Link fix back to ticket

PR #456: Fixes #123
- Root cause: US-only postal code validation
- Fix: Added international format support
- Bugbot assistance: Identified issue in 10 min
- Tests: Added for UK, CA, AU, DE, FR formats

Benefits:

  • Consistent bug report format
  • Easy to track Bugbot effectiveness
  • Clear audit trail

Advanced: Bugbot for Performance Issues

Real case: Slow report generation (Client A)

Step 1: Provide profiling data

You: "Report generation is slow (3+ minutes)

Profiling data:
- Database queries: 2.5 minutes (85%)
- Data processing: 0.4 minutes (12%)
- Rendering: 0.1 minutes (3%)

Slow query log:
[paste EXPLAIN ANALYZE output]

Code:
@src/reports/ReportGenerator.ts
@src/reports/ReportService.ts

Help identify performance bottlenecks."

Step 2: Bugbot analyzes

Bugbot identifies:
1. N+1 query pattern (loading related data in loop)
2. Missing indexes on joined tables
3. Processing entire dataset in memory

Step 3: Iterative optimization

You: "Fix issue #1 (N+1 queries) first.
Show me before/after query patterns."

[Bugbot suggests eager loading]

You: "Implement that fix + benchmark it"

[Apply, test, measure: 3min → 45s]

You: "Now fix issue #2 (missing indexes)"

[Bugbot suggests indexes]

You: "Generate CREATE INDEX statements + migration"

[Apply, test, measure: 45s → 20s]

Key: One optimization at a time, measure after each.

Best Practices Summary

Do:

  • Give clear reproduction steps
  • Include full error messages and stack traces
  • Reference specific files with @
  • Ask for root cause explanation first
  • Review and test thoroughly
  • Use rules to guide Bugbot behavior

Don't:

  • Use for bugs you already understand (slower)
  • Accept first suggestion without review
  • Skip testing "because Bugbot did it"
  • Use for security vulnerabilities (need human review)
  • Expect Bugbot to know business logic

Remember: Bugbot is a debugging partner, not a magic fix button. The human is still responsible for:

  • Verifying the fix is correct
  • Understanding the root cause
  • Ensuring no regressions
  • Making final call on approach